Why the Four Levels of Speech Matter?
Introduction:
In the Vedantic tradition, the journey to Self-realization is not merely a quest for knowledge, but a progressive refinement of awareness. When exploring this profound journey, understanding the four levels of speech in Vedanta is essential. One of the most subtle and powerful frameworks for understanding this inner journey is the doctrine of Vak (Vani) — the four levels of speech.
Speech, thought, and consciousness are not separate processes. They arise from a common source and dissolve back into that source. By understanding how speech descends from silence to sound, the seeker gains insight into how the mind itself emerges from consciousness — and how it may finally return to silence.
The teaching of Para, Pashyanti, Madhyama, and Vaikhari reveals that samadhi is not the suppression of thought, but the transcendence of speech and mind at their source. Silence here is not emptiness; it is pure, self-luminous awareness.
Thus, the study of the four levels of speech in Vedanta is not theoretical. It is a practical map for inner absorption, where language dissolves, the mind rests, and Consciousness abides in itself.
This perspective invites a deeper inquiry into what is meant by knowledge itself. Beyond information and conceptual clarity lies a transformative knowing, explored more fully in higher knowledge and right understanding, where understanding matures into direct insight rather than mere intellectual assent.
https://arunsingha.in/2023/01/12/higher-knowledge-and-right-understanding/

Textual Sources and Authority:
The doctrine of the four levels of speech—Para, Pashyanti, Madhyama, and Vaikhari—is not derived from a single text, but emerges organically from the Indian scriptural tradition. Its earliest vision appears in the Rig Veda, especially the Vak Sukta (10.125), where speech is celebrated as a cosmic power (Shakti). The Upanishads, particularly the Taittiriya Upanishad, establish the transcendence of Brahman beyond speech and mind, providing the philosophical ground for Para Vak. The most explicit and systematic exposition of the fourfold Vak is found in Vakyapadiya of Bhartrhari, where language, meaning, and consciousness are shown as a single continuum. Tantric and Shaiva texts further interpret Vak as Shakti descending into manifestation, while Adi Shankaracharya, through Advaita Vedanta, confirms that ultimate knowledge arises where speech and mind fall silent. Together, these sources form a coherent and authoritative foundation for the teaching of Vak in Vedanta.
Vak (Vani): Speech as Consciousness
In Indian philosophy, Vak (Vani) is not merely language or speech.
It is Shakti — the creative power of Consciousness itself.
Just as Brahman manifests the universe, Vak manifests meaning, thought, sound, and expression. Speech is therefore not accidental or mechanical; it is a sacred movement of awareness taking form.
The ancient seers declared:
“Vak is the mother of the Vedas.”
Speech is understood as descending from pure Consciousness into audible sound, passing through four distinct levels — Para, Pashyanti, Madhyama, and Vaikhari.
This ancient insight forms the foundation of what is known as the four levels of speech in Vedanta.
This teaching is not linguistic alone.
It is a science of the mind — and of that which transcends the mind.
Vak as Consciousness in Descent
Vak does not originate at the tongue.
It originates in silence.
The Upanishads clearly indicate that speech and mind share a common source, and that both ultimately return to that source. Speech and thought arise together and dissolve together, revealing a reality that is prior to both.
This profound truth is expressed in a celebrated mantra from the Taittiriya Upanishad (Brahmananda Valli 2.9):
Full Mantra (for clarity)
Sanskrit (IAST-free):
Yato vacho nivartante aprapya manasa saha
Anandam brahmano vidvan na bibheti kadachana
Meaning:
That Brahman, from which speech turns back,
along with the mind, unable to reach It—
one who knows that Brahman as Bliss
fears nothing at any time.
This mantra serves as the Upanishadic authority for the doctrine of Vak.
It establishes the limit of speech and thought, while simultaneously pointing to a knowledge that is direct, immediate, and self-revealing.
Why This Mantra Is Central to Vak (Vani)
This mantra directly points to Para Vak, where:
-
Speech cannot function
-
Mind cannot grasp
-
Conceptualization ceases
All later elaborations on Para, Pashyanti, Madhyama, and Vaikhari are philosophical unfoldings of this single insight.
In essence:
-
Vaikhari → speech operates
-
Madhyama → mind operates
-
Pashyanti → intuition operates
-
Para → even these return
1. Para Vak — Supreme Speech
Para means beyond.
-
Nature: Transcendent, undifferentiated, silent
-
Location (symbolic): Muladhara or Sahasrara (depending on tradition)
-
State: Pure Consciousness (Chit)
-
Expression: No sound, no thought, no distinction
Here, speech exists only as potential, like a seed containing the entire tree.
There is no vibration, no articulation, no division.
Para Vak is identical with Brahman — non-dual, timeless, and formless.
🔹 In Vedantic terms: this is Vak as Sat-Chit-Ananda.
2. Pashyanti Vak — Seeing Speech
Pashyanti comes from pashya — “to see”.
-
Nature: Intuitive, luminous, undivided meaning
-
Location: Heart region (Anahata)
-
State: Idea before division into words
At this level, meaning is seen as a whole, not broken into language.
There is no subject–object split — knower, known, and knowing remain one.
🔹 This is the level of Drishti, where mantra exists as living insight, not sound.
3. Madhyama Vak — Middle Speech
Madhyama means intermediate.
-
Nature: Mental speech, inner dialogue
-
Location: Throat / Mind (Ajna influence)
-
State: Thought structured into words, but unspoken
This is the realm of grammar, logic, reasoning, and intention.
Words begin to form, distinctions arise, and meaning becomes sequential.
🔹 This is where manas and buddhi operate.
4. Vaikhari Vak — Articulated Speech
Vaikhari is the audible, external speech.
-
Nature: Gross sound
-
Location: Mouth and vocal organs
-
State: Spoken words, chants, conversations
This is the most visible and limited form of Vak.
Sound is bound by time, space, pronunciation, and hearing.
🔹 All ordinary language belongs to Vaikhari.
Seen in this light, the movement of Vak from Vaikhari back to Para is not abstract theory, but a lived inner progression. This inward unfolding closely parallels the stages described in the journey to realization, where awareness gradually withdraws from outer expression and comes to rest in silent presence.
https://arunsingha.in/2023/10/04/the-journey-to-realization-a-brief-overview/
The Descent of Consciousness into Sound
| Level | Mode | Nature |
|---|---|---|
| Para | Silence | Pure Being |
| Pashyanti | Vision | Undivided Meaning |
| Madhyama | Thought | Structured Language |
| Vaikhari | Sound | Audible Speech |
This descent of Vak mirrors the descent of the Absolute into creation itself.

Vedantic Emphasis: Shankara’s Fundamental Standpoint
According to Adi Shankaracharya, this mantra does not glorify Brahman as something mysterious to be guessed or poetically praised.
Instead, it establishes a methodological limit of all instruments of knowledge.
Shankara’s Key Assertions
-
Speech (vak) is a product of mind and intellect
-
Mind (manas) functions only where:
-
subject–object duality exists
-
conceptualization is possible
-
-
Brahman is non-dual
-
therefore not an object
-
therefore not reachable by mind or speech
-
Thus, when the Upanishad says “speech returns”, it does not mean Brahman is unknown.
It means Brahman is known in a way where speech is no longer needed.
Shankara’s Interpretation — Line by Line
1. Yato vachah nivartante
(From which speech returns)
-
Speech operates only by naming and qualifying
-
Brahman is nirguna (attribute-less)
-
Speech fails not due to weakness, but due to inapplicability
👉 This corresponds to Para Vak.
2. Aprapya manasa saha
(Along with the mind, unable to reach)
-
Mind reaches objects through vritti (modifications)
-
Brahman is not produced, modified, or reached
-
It is self-revealing (svayam-prakasha)
👉 This negates Madhyama Vak as a means of final knowledge.
3. Anandam brahmano vidvan
(One who knows Brahman as Ananda)
-
Knowledge of Brahman is not verbal
-
It is identity-knowledge (aham brahmasmi)
-
Ananda is not pleasure, but absence of limitation
👉 This is Pashyanti transcended into Para.
4. Na bibheti kadachana
(He never fears)
Fear arises only where there is:
-
duality
-
otherness
When Vak and mind dissolve, only non-dual awareness remains.
Vak Doctrine Seen Through Shankara
Shankara does not explicitly systematize Para–Pashyanti–Madhyama–Vaikhari,
yet his Advaita perfectly supports it.
| Vak Level | Function | Status in Advaita |
|---|---|---|
| Vaikhari | Spoken words | Empirical (vyavaharika) |
| Madhyama | Mental speech | Instrumental |
| Pashyanti | Intuitive meaning | Subtle but limited |
| Para | Silence / Being | Brahman itself |
➡️ Knowledge culminates where Vak ceases.
Mantra serves as a subtle bridge in this return journey, guiding sound back toward silence. This dynamic is especially evident in the contemplation of Om, examined in Om: bridging Vedic wisdom and brainwave science, where ancient insight and modern understanding meet in the study of consciousness and resonance.
https://arunsingha.in/2024/08/19/om-bridging-vedic-wisdom-and-brainwave-science/
Mantra, Silence, and Realization
Ordinary speech remains at Vaikhari–Madhyama.
Mantra japa, when deepened, reverses the journey:
Vaikhari → Madhyama → Pashyanti → Para
As sound dissolves into silence, realization dawns.
This is why the highest truth is conveyed not through eloquence, but through silence.
Closing Reflection
Speech arises from silence.
Thought arises from stillness.
Meaning shines before words.
Truth remains when all expressions fall away.
To understand Vak is to understand how Consciousness becomes the world —
and how the seeker may return from sound to the Source.
This is Vedanta.
This is the science of mind — and that which is beyond mind.

This is such a beautiful and clear explanation. It turns something we use every day—our speech and thoughts—into a sacred map for finding peace and truth.
What touches me most is the reminder that silence isn’t empty or lonely. It’s the source of everything, full of presence and awareness. It’s comforting to know that when my mind is noisy with worry or too many thoughts (stuck in Madhyama), there’s a way back. I can trace those thoughts inward, to the quiet intuition of Pashyanti, and finally rest in the silent, peaceful wholeness of Para.
It makes the spiritual journey feel very practical. It’s not about rejecting the world of words and sound, but understanding where they come from. By listening to the space between my words, or feeling the intention before I speak, I’m taking a step toward that inner silence.
Thank you for sharing this Arun sir 🤝 It’s a profound gift to see our ordinary experience as a path leading directly back to the stillness and joy of our true Self.🙏🏼
Thank you so much Srikanth Sir ji for adding your insights to this post.
Since long I have been following the path of silence.
Outer silence is easy to maintain by going alone to a place of loneliness. But the inner silence is very hard to maintain.
With practice it will be possible to maintain.
That is why I have posted this post a basic fundamental steps as followed by ancient sages.
I am thankful to you for your support and encouragement through your words of wisdom.
Best regards.🙏😁
Thank you so much Arun ji for your kind reply 🤝🙏🏼
🙏🙏